Running the new 75cm gauge FCCC

A puzzling picture early in the new regime. A Baldwin is decorated for some reason at the head of a passenger train, but why do the tracks to the left appear to have a disused inner 75cm rail and clean bright outer rails?

 

 

Mixed feelings
Many of the more influential local people had become rather disillusioned with the service provided by the FCCC. They saw the government's plans and the rumoured expropriation of the railway as altogether a good thing (1). Railwaymen on the other hand, whilst in favour of government ownership on political grounds, certainly did not see the conversion to 75cm gauge as a step forward. Edgar Calderon, later the last superintendent of the line, is on record as having had doubts about the speeds and load-carrying capacity of the narrower gauge (2).

Q. E. D. - Trelew station. Date and circumstances unknown.

 

 

Sources of traffic
The agricultural produce of the Chubut Valley was important to the railway. There was wool, and live sheep to be carried from the estancias, and a variety of fruit and vegetables grown on the irrigated parts of the valley floor.

There were also sources of minerals to provide loads for the trains. Boca de la Zanja, Campamento Villegas and Las Chapas all had kaolin (china clay) pits alongside the railway. In the 1950s this was the most profitable traffic left to the railway. There were also limestone deposits near of Campamento Villegas. A 1957 report by the Puerto Madryn Traffic Superintendent also talks wistfully of further mineral deposits near Las Chapas, and hopes that they might be exploited to the benefit of the railway.

The plans to extend towards the cordillera had looked forwards to trade between the coast and the cooler more fertile mountain valleys, but obviously that did not materialise. In the circumstances it is unlikely that the nationalised line satisfied the local populace any more than had the British owned railway.

Timetables
The 1942 public timetable is also provided,and though from a later date the 1960 working timetable rules give some insight into the detailed working of the railway.

Operating details
The best source of operational detail is the 1989 book of anecdotes by ex-railwaymen published under the title of
Los Ferroviarios que perdimos el Tren (2). However, such snippets do not lend themselves to systematic analysis. Here follow a few oddments:

Trains bound for Puerto Madryn from Trelew would sometimes have a banking engine attached at the rear for the first 7 or 13km depending on the load. This would uncouple without notice, presumably by the fireman releasing the front coupling from the running board.

Whilst passenger trains ran only as far as Rawson on the branch during winter, in the summer months they were extended to Playa Union. The weekend trains often loaded to 23 coaches

Track layouts
Whilst track layouts at Rawson and Dolavon have been shown on the extensions page here is the final layout for Puerto Madryn. That for Trelew is so large that it has been placed on a separate appendix page. Click here to see it
.

The Puerto Madryn layout shows a number of loops at the station and the largest number of sidings on the approach to the muelle as one might expect. The loco depot has a turntable but there is also a triangle. There are several private sidings. It seems that points/switches were normally set such that a runaway approaching from the south would be diverted safely rather than colliding with other stock or over-running onto the muelle.

 

 

FC Patagónico
After the nationalization of all foreign-owned railways by President Juan Peron in 1948, the F. C. E. lines in Patagonia were combined to form the Ferrocarril Nacional Patagónico with effect from 1st January 1949. This probably made little difference other than to introduce a new livery. A first class carriage of the 1922 batch was lying at Rio Gallegos in the 1970s still carrying a brown livery with the word 'Patagónico' below the roofline and '1a' at each end of the bodysides.

There were still signs of optimism despite the growing competition from road transport. A 1955 report from the 'Patagónico' management to the commissioner for Chubut Province is attached (together with an English translation). This talks of station rebuilds, proposed new diesel-electric locomotives, negotiations for new railcars, and the transfer of surplus 75cm. gauge stock from the 'Ministerio de Obras Publicas' in Comodoro Rivadavia. It also mentions the hopes for a broad gauge line from Puerto Madryn north to Sierra Grande and eventually to join the General Roca line at San Antonio (Oeste). More realistically it refers to the rural bus/ coach services (Automotora Pullman)which the railway was promoting as feeder services.

Baldwin no. 13, in the 1940s or '50s judging by the clothes of the crew.

 

 

The dam construction branch
However, traffic seems to have declined rapidly in the late1950s owing to road competition. The only bright spot was that a new 10km. branch had been opened in 1945 at Las Chapas to serve the Florentino Ameghino Dam construction site. About 1,500 tons of cement a month came up from Comodoro Rivadavia by sea and train. There were also two temporary stations to serve the two construction workers camps.

Closure
The dam work kept the line open until 1958 when the work ended. The line was then completely closed from 1960. A report from 1961 analysing the financial prospects if the line was to be reopened, can be viewed in Spanish and in English.

 

The difficulties of working an isolated railway line which runs only to the coast and not to the major cities, are covered elsewhere in this site. However, even at the end the railway was still employing about 300 people. Suggestions were made for reduvcing this to 200, but I suspect that Argentinian politics would not have allowed the staffing levels to be reduced to 'sensible' levels. For a railway operating the number of trains that this one was doing, a sensible number of employees might have been 30 or so! Would this have made sufficient difference to costs to allow the railway to remain open? A more recent parallel is with the Esquel line. This too employed about 300 staff. The FFCC Argentinos ducked the question of sacking many of them by off-loading the whole line onto the provincial governments. The railway closed, presumably making all 300 redundant, and the Chubut part was then re-opened and has a current staff of, I believe, twenty-one.

The railway's rolling stock at the closure is summarised in the table below:

Material rodante trocha 0,750m.
75cm. gauge rolling stock

Locomotoras Locomotives

Baldwin

11

Henschel

10

21

Vagones Wagons

Cubiertos Covered vans/boxcars

63

Hacienda 1 piso Livestock 1 level

26

Bordes altos High-sided

66

Plataformas Platforms

124

279

Tanques Tanks

Petróleo Petroleum

5

Gas oil

1

Agua Water

15

21

Furgones Brake vans

Pasajeros Passenger

4

Carga Goods

2

Servicio Maintenance

10

16

Coches Passenger cars

Primera classe First class

8

Segunda class Second class

2

Mixto

1

Clase única

12

23

Coches motor Railcars

Mixto

1

Frigorifico (fuera de servicio)
Refrigerated (out of service)

1

2

Thoughts of reopening
The track and equipment remained intact and in 1964 it was proposed to reopen the railway. This was vigorously opposed by the local bus companies, but the proposal was only finally killed by a mysterious fire which swept through Trelew carriage shed one night destroying fifteen carriages.

A view looking west through the carriage shed shortly after the fire in 1964. The station building is on the far left.

 

 

A view from the opposite direction

 

 

The track was lifted between 1969 and 1974, with the section in Gaiman tunnel being the last to go.

Marcelo Arcas visited Trelew during the 1960s and has displayed a selection of his photos from that period on the web at <//usarios.lycos.es/arcasm/k-trelew.htm>.

Much of the equipment had already been dispersed to other lines before the closure. This is detailed in the next chapter. However, a report produced at the time of closure lists the following 'moveable assets':

Dereliction and dismantling
My visit in 1975 showed much goods stock still lying at Puerto Madryn, whilst one Henschel 2-8-2, two Henschel 0-6-0Ts and one crane tank lay derelict. Some wagons were still in use on the pier. The goods shed was also still in use.

 

At Trelew the goods shed was used for wool storage, whilst the goods offices had become a bus station. There were also a broken weighbridge and the hulks of four Baldwins lying in the shell of the old loco shed. These engines look to have been stripped professionally, perhaps for the parts to be re-used at El Maiten. Vandals or stealers of non-ferrous fittings would hardly have gone so far as to lift the frames and take some of the wheelsets!

 

Surviving relics and remains
There is a page in chapter four devoted to the surviving parts of the FC Central del Chubut. Relics of the 75cm gauge period are covered there.

References:
1 Article in El Pueblo. 2nd December 1921.
2In Los Ferroviarios que perdiamos el Tren. V. Accorinti et al.

28-5-08

RETURN
to home page

RETURN
to top of page

NEXT PAGE
The line to Esquel

NEXT CHAPTER
Estancia & frigorifico lines